Pitfalls of the Narrative Life (Part I)

Posted in Enormous Hotel on July 17, 2008 by sk0t

For words, symbols and signs there are at least two common ways of deriving meaning. The sign and signifier are commonly used by Language poets and others when they drone on about their craft and how it figures into the larger role of language and the human condition and the organization of power structures. I won’t even get into how self-absorbed and boring it is to actually hear or read a poet disclose the significance of the mechanics of the composition and revision of their work. Poet on the poem. Aesthetic assumptions made manifest in words should resonate on all levels quite a bit like a good poem walking with its own life and automatic senses.

So let us for now only speak about the general possibilities and implications of narrative and non-narrative. Story or not. Every individual has a story that is beyond their control that is imposed upon them. You are Colombian and Colombians generally like coffee. Coffee is therefore a part of the story that “we” have for you. There is no escaping Spiritus Mundi or the collective unconscious. “How odd that you do not like coffee…”

Every American novel is written in the shadow of the “Great American Novel” or the narrative that accurately portrays American life. We likewise look at our lives as if there is one definitive story about us, that only we can tell. That is essentially one’s life work; to impress the real story of our lives onto the fabric of reality so that we may be rightly known before we die. Maybe that story will carry on.

It is true that narratives are truly metaphors for the life process. Narratives generally adhere to a birth, growth and decline format. Beyond this, and perhaps most significantly due to this alone, the language of the story is employed in a literalist fashion. Whether or not Ahab is a metaphor for evil is irrelevent; to talk about Moby Dick, one must talk about its characters and things as being literally things performing recognizable deeds. That they are also other things is really up to the speculation of the reader. All this speculation brings one back to personal experience of the world of things, and the stories one has remembered. What about the stories that are forgotten?

For the narrow purposes here, narrative is delivered through the literalist universe of human consciousness. Why is the narrative so strong in the world when the human brain is figuralist/relativist?

Bill Henson and the Social Hysteria of Vampirism

Posted in Hearing the Voices on May 29, 2008 by sk0t

Bill Henson’s photographic subjects are nude emaciated teenagers. That they are photographs of real nude teenagers seems to be what is so objectionable to some fascists in Australia. It would seem that these “children” have parents and are more than just images. Why are they threatening photographs, then?

This is obviously not the entire issue. The compositional style is interesting, arousing, shameful, ambivalent, beautiful, degrading. One feels that the subject, if it is the human in the photograph, is being vampirized by the surrounding darkness and ultimately, by the photographer as well as the viewer. In their vulnerable state, the pubescent men and women are a hopeless offering of innocence. Much of the criticism up until the museum raids has been right on. The photographs compositionally speaking, are “obvious.” The pull between innocence and sexuality, purity and degradation is on display in such a way photographically, that the placement of the mask of vampire and consumer is so indelible that the weaker of conscious beings is compelled to tear the mask off of themselves at any cost–including destroying the creator of this visceral theater. What makes the photograph so beautiful is the very fact that the viewer becomes explicitly a vampire of the image, experiencing the requisite guilt that goes along with appreciation of all levels of sexual drama and dualistic conflict, or appropriation of object. One cannot recycle the Beauty. It is used up. What remains is photograph, a measure of the pull of light through all figuralist connotations. The question then remains, is art only allowed to safely appropriate Beauty?

Sleeping Gas

Posted in The Duende on May 22, 2008 by sk0t

Is it unthinkable that we are pumping sleeping gas in my place of work? Is it unthinkable that my office could be thus contaminated by unknown compounds producing lethargy? A man entered my office today and demanded 16 cents, “no more,” he said. His demeanor was embarrassing: he seemed to slobber a bit when he spoke and slurred every pronounced ‘s’ to the degree that I cannot help conjecture that he is part of some cabal organized by an extant snake cult so insignificant that their existence is not only unknown, but downright uninteresting–unknown even to himself; indeed, he is the only member. This could alternately seem rather extraordinary: a man really came into your office who was unanounced and unknown to you and demanded no more than 16 cents? That is surely at least a bit entertaining. No, I am afraid it is not. My uncle used to deal in poisonous gasses of all sorts, having spent much time in the east as a black market profiteer, or “creative speculator” as he put it. He did some business with a Master Lo for five years. The nature of their business was a rare “salt” that could be procured from a burned corpse. My uncle stumbled upon this bizarre commodity in an unexpected air raid in a small village that translated to English as something similar to “Above the river, the lizard devours its young.” The Lizard Village had been my uncle’s home at this point, for only a few months. It was the peak of summer (harvest time for the “salt”) and my uncle had been sharing the comforts of his bed with a young girl of fifteen when loud explosions could be heard from all around. Soon came the screams from old women with high shrill screams. “The Lizard returns!”

Eureka –E.A. Poe

Posted in Enormous Hotel on May 3, 2008 by sk0t

…But this catastrophe–what is it? We have seen accomplished the ingathering of the orbs. Henceforward, are we not to understand one material globe of globes as comprehending and constituting the universe? Such a fancy would be altogether at war with every assumption and consideration of this Discourse.

I have already alluded to that absolute reciprocity of adaptation which is the idiosyncrasy of the Divine Art–stamping it divine. Up to this point of our reflections, we have been regarding the electrical influence as a something by dint of whose repulsion alone Matter is enabled to exist in that state of diffusion demanded for the fulfillment of its purposes; so far, in a word, we have been considering the influence in question as ordained for Matter’s sake to subserve the objects of Matter. With a perfectly legitimate reciprocity, we are now permitted to look at Matter, as created solely for the sake of this influence–solely to serve the objects of this spiritual Ether. Through the aid, by the means, through the agency, of Matter, and by dint of its heterogeneity, is this Ether manifested–is Spirit individualized. It is merely in the development of this Ether, through heterogeneity, that particular masses of Matter become animate–sensitive–and in the ratio of their heterogeneity; some reaching a degree of sensitiveness involving what we call Thought, and thus attaining obviously Conscious Intelligence.
In this view, we are enabled to perceive Matter as a Means, not as an End. Its purposes are thus seen to have been comprehended in its diffusion; and with the return into Unity these purposes cease. The absolutely consolidated globe of globes would be objectless; therefore not for a moment could it continue to exist. Matter, created for an end, would unquestionably, on fulfillment of that end, be Matter no longer. Let us endeavor to understand that it would disappear, and that God would remain all in all.
That every work of Divine conception must coexist and coexpire with its particular design, seems to me especially obvious; and I make no doubt that, on perceiving the final globe of globes to be objectless, the majority of my readers will be satisfied with my “therefore it cannot continue to exist.” Nevertheless, as the startling thought of its instantaneous disappearance is one which the most powerful intellect cannot be expected readily to entertain on grounds so decidedly abstract, let us endeavor to look at the idea from some other and more ordinary point of view; let us see how thoroughly and beautifully it is corroborated in an a posteriori consideration of Matter as we actually find it.
I have before said that “Attraction and Repulsion being undeniably the sole properties by which Matter is manifested to Mind, we are justified in assuming that Matter exists only as Attraction and Repulsion; in other words, that Attraction and Repulsion are Matter; there being no conceivable case in which we may not employ the term ‘Matter’ and the terms ‘Attraction’ and ‘Repulsion’ taken together, as equivalent, and therefore convertible, expressions of Logic.”
Now the very definition of Attraction implies particularity–the existence of parts, particles, or atoms; for we define it as the tendency of “each atom, etc., to every other atom,” etc., according to a certain law. Of course where there are no parts, where there is absolute Unity, where the tendency to oneness is satisfied, there can be no Attraction;–this has been fully shown, and all Philosophy admits it. When, on fulfillment of its purposes, then, Matter shall have returned into its original condition of One–a condition which presupposes the expulsion of the separative Ether, whose province and whose capacity are limited to keeping the atoms apart until that great day when, this Ether being no longer needed, the overwhelming pressure of the finally collective Attraction shall at length just sufficiently predominate and expel it–when, I say, Matter, finally, expelling the Ether, shall have returned into absolute Unity, it will then (to speak paradoxically for the moment) be Matter without Attraction and without Repulsion–in other words, Matter without Matter–in other words, again, Matter no more. In sinking into Unity it will sink at once into that Nothingness which, to all finite perception, Unity must be; into that Material Nihility from which alone we can conceive it to have been evoked, to have been created, by the Volition of God.
I repeat, then–Let us endeavor to comprehend that the final globe of globes will instantaneously disappear, and that God will remain all in all.
But are we here to pause? Not so. On the Universal agglomeration and dissolution, we can readily conceive that a new and perhaps totally different series of conditions may ensue; another creation and radiation, returning into itself; another action and reaction of the Divine Will. Guiding our imagination s by that omniprevalent law of laws, the law of periodicity, are we not, indeed, more than justified in entertaining a belief–let us say, rather, in indulging a hope–that the processes we have here ventured to contemplate will be renewed forever, and forever, and then subsiding into nothingness, at every throb of the Heart Divine?
And now–this Heart Divine–what is it? It is our own.
Let not the merely seeming irreverence of this idea frighten our souls from that cool exercise of consciousness, from that deep tranquility of self-inspection, through which alone we can hope to attain the presence of this, the most sublime of truths, and look it leisurely in the face.
The phenomena on which our conclusions must at this point depend are merely spiritual shadows, but not the less thoroughly substantial.
We walk about, amid the destinies of our world-existence, encompassed by dim but ever present Memories of a Destiny more vast–very distant in the bygone time, and infinitely awful.
We live out a Youth peculiarly haunted by such shadows; yet never mistaking them for dreams. As Memories we know them. During our Youth the distinction is too clear to deceive us even for a moment.
So long as this Youth endures, the feeling that we exist is the most natural of all feelings. We understand it thoroughly. That there was a period at which we did not exist–or, that it might so have happened that we never had existed at all–are the considerations, indeed, which, during this Youth, we find difficulty in understanding. Why we should not exist, is, up to the epoch of our Manhood, of all queries the most unanswerable. Existence–self-existence–existence from all Time and to all Eternity–seems, up to the epoch of Manhood, a normal and unquestionable condition;–seems, because it is.
But now comes the period at which a conventional World-Reason awakens us from the truth of our dream. Doubt, Surprise, and Incomprehensibility arrive at the same moment. They say: “You live, and the time was when you lived not. You have been created. An Intelligence exists greater than your own; and it is only through this Intelligence you live at all.” These things we struggle to comprehend and cannot;–cannot, because these things, being untrue, are thus, of necessity, incomprehensible.
No thinking being lives who, at some luminous point of his life of thought, has not felt himself lost amid the surges of futile efforts at understanding or believing that anything exists greater than his own soul. The utter impossibility of any one’s soul feeling itself inferior to another; the intense, overwhelming dissatisfaction and rebellion at the thought; these, with the omniprevalent aspirations at perfection, are but the spiritual, coincident with the material, struggles towards the original Unity; are, to my mind at least, a species of proof far surpassing what Man terms demonstration, that no soul is inferior to another; that nothing is, or can be, superior to any one soul; that each soul is, in part, its own God–its own Creator;–in a word, that God–the material and spiritual God–now exists solely in the diffused Matter and Spirit of the Universe; and that the re-gathering of this diffused Matter and Spirit will be but the re-constitution of the purely Spiritual and Individual God.
In this view, and in this view alone, we comprehend the riddles of Divine Injustice–of Inexorable Fate. In this view alone the existence of Evil become intelligible; but in this view it becomes more–it becomes endurable. Our souls no longer rebel at a Sorrow which we ourselves have imposed upon ourselves, in furtherance of our own purposes–with a view, if even with a futile view–to the extension of our own Joy.
I have spoken of Memories that haunt us during our Youth. They sometimes pursue us even into our Manhood; assume gradually less and less indefinite shapes; now and then speak to us with low voices, saying:–
“There was an epoch in the Night of Time, when a still-existent Being existed, one of an absolutely infinite number of similar Beings that people the absolutely infinite domains of the absolutely infinite space. It was not and is not in the power of this Being, any more than it is in your own, to extend, by actual increase, the joy of His Existence; but, just as it is in your power to expand or to concentrate your pleasures (the absolute amount of happiness remaining always the same), so did and does a similar capability appertain to this Divine Being, who thus passes His Eternity in perpetual variation of Concentrated Self and almost Infinite Self-Diffusion. What you call the Universe of Stars is but His present expansive existence. He now feels His life through an infinity of imperfect pleasures; the partial and pain-intertangled pleasures of those inconceivably numerous things which you designate as His creatures, but which are really but infinite individualizations of Himself. All these creatures–all–those whom you term animate, as well as those to which you deny life for no better reason than that you do not behold it in operation–all these creatures have, in a greater or less degree, a capacity for pleasure and for pain; but the general sum of their sensations is precisely that amount of Happiness which appertains by right to the Divine Being when concentrated within Himself. These creatures are all, too, more or less, and more or less obviously, conscious Intelligences; conscious, first, of a proper identity; conscious, secondly, and by faint indeterminate glimpses, of an identity with the Divine Being of whom we speak–of an identity with God. Of the two classes of consciousness, fancy that the former will grow weaker, the latter stronger, during the long succession of ages which must elapse before these myriads of individual Intelligences become blended–when the bright stars become blended–into One. Think that the sense of individual identity will be gradually merged in the general consciousness; that Man, for example, ceasing imperceptibly to feel himself Man, will at length attain that awfully triumphant epoch when he shall recognize his existence as that of Jehovah. In the mean time bear in mind that all is Life–Life–Life within Life–the less within the greater, and all within the Spirit Divine1.

1 The pain of the consideration that we shall lose our individual identity ceases at once when we further reflect that the process, as above described, is neither more nor less than the absorption by each individual intelligence of all other intelligences (that is, of the Universe) into its own. That God may be all in all, each must become God.

“IN SHORT, I HAVE NOTHING WITH WHICH TO EXPRESS…” Cesar Vallejo

Posted in The Duende on May 3, 2008 by sk0t

In short, I have nothing with which to express my life except my death.

And, after all, at the end of graded nature and the sparrow in bloc, I sleep, hand in hand with my shadow.

And, upon descending from the venerable act and from the other groan, I rest thinking about the inexorable march of time.

Why the rope, then, if air is so simple? What is the chain for, if iron exists on its own?

Cesar Vallejo, the accent with which you love, the language with which you write, the soft wind with which you hear, only know of you through your throat.

Cesar Vallejo, fall on your knees, therefore, with indistinct pride, with a bridal bed of ornamental asps and hexagonal echoes.

Return to the corporeal honey comb, to Beauty; aromatize the blossomed corks, close both caves to the enraged anthropoid; mend, finally, your unpleasant stag; feel sorry for yourself.

For there is nothing denser than hate in the passive voice, no stingier udder than love!

For I am no longer able to walk, except on two harps!

For you no longer know me, unless instrumentally, fastidiously I follow you!

For I no longer issue worms, but breves!

For I now implicate you so much, you almost become sharp!

For I now carry some timid vegetables and others that are fierce!

Because the affection that ruptures at night in my bronchia, was brought during the day by hidden deacons and, if when my morning begins I am pale, it is because of my work; and if when my night begins I am red, because of my worker. This equally explains this weariness of mine and these spoils, my famous uncles. This explains, finally, this tear that I offer as a toast to the happiness of men.

Cesar Vallejo, it is hard
to believe that your relatives are so late,
knowing that I walk imprisoned,
knowing that you lie free!
What dazzling and shitty luck!
Cesar Vallejo, I hate you with tenderness!

(trans. C. Eshleman)

Excerpts from Artaud’s The trip to Mexico (1936) translated from the French by Helen Weaver

Posted in Enormous Hotel on March 29, 2008 by sk0t

FIRST CONTACT WITH THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION

The present world crisis has reached France after the other countries but, although this is not apparent, it has affected France more seriously. Contrary to what is happening elsewhere, modern France is suffering more acutely from the crisis in her consciousness than from the one affecting her capital and her wealth, and French youth are particularly sensitive to the effects of the crisis…

WHAT I CAME TO MEXICO TO DO

I came to Mexico in search of politicians, not artists.

And this is why:

Until now I have been an artist, which means I have been a man without power. For there is no doubt that from a social point of view artists are slaves.

Well, I say that this must change.

There was a time when the artist was a sage, that is, a cultivated man who was also a thaumaturge, a magus, a therapeutist, and even a gymnasiarch–that combination which in carnival language is called a “one-man band” or “Protean man.” The artist united in his person all the faculties and all the sciences. Then came the age of specialization, which was also the age of decadence. One cannot deny it: a society which turns science into an infinite number of sciences is a society which is degenerating…

Beneath the contributions of modern science which is every day discovering new forces, there are other unknown forces, other subtle forces which do not yet belong to the realm of science but which may belong to it someday. These forces are part of the vital realm of nature as men knew it in pagan times. The superstitious mind of man gave a religious form to these profound understandings which saw man, if you will permit the expression, as the “catalyst of the universe.”

Well, the conquest of modern Mexico and this contribution of capital importance which Mexico can bring us today consist precisely in the discovery of those analogical forces thanks to which the organism of man functions in harmony with the organism of nature and governs it. And insofar as science and poetry are a single and identical thing, this is as much the business of poets and artists as it is the business of scientists, as was clear at the time of the Popol Vuh.

But this time the rediscovery will be clean of all superstition, of all religious meaning, however slight.

In short, it is a question of reviving the old sacred idea, the great idea of pagan pantheism, this time in a form that will no longer be religious but scientific. True pantheism is not a philosophical system, it is merely a means of dynamic investigation of the universe.

This is the lesson which modern Mexico can teach us. Mexico is appropriating the forms of the mechanistic civilization of Europe and adapting them to its own spirit. What does it matter if this spirit is calculated to destroy these forms!

If it does destroy them, it will be in time, when it has already armed itself with its own strength, that is, when this spirit of the ancient synthetic culture of the Toltecs and the Mayas has regained sufficient force to allow Mexico to abandon European civilization without danger. Once again, this is not a utopia but a scientific reality that cannot be denied. If one is willing to accept the idea that man is the catalyst of the universe, one must conclude that the moral forces of man vibrate in unison with the forces of the universe, those forces which, according to the teachings of high monist philosophy, are neither physical nor mental but may assume either a mental or a physical aspect according to the sense in which one wants to utilize them.

The Cross of Palenque perfectly embodies the synthetic image of this twofold action.

Here, inscribed in stone, is the hieroglyphic representation of a single energy which, through the cross of space, that is, by passing through the four cardinal points, moves from man to the animal and to the plants.

TO JEAN-LOUIS BARRAULT

Mexico City, July 10, 1936

My dear Barrault,

Since I last wrote you, the situation has changed.

A petition signed by the most eminent intellectuals and artists of Mexico, and countersigned by several ministers and ministerial departments, has recently been sent to the President of the Republic, asking that I be given the means to carry out a Mission in connection with the old races of Indians.

This mission has to do with discovering and reviving the vestiges of the ancient Solar culture.

But I must remain alive until everything is ready; and like Bernard Palissy, I am burning the furniture and living like an ascetic in despair.

I must have the help of my friends in Paris.

I ask you, therefore, not to wait any longer but to make an effort and send whatever you can. It does not matter whether you do it as a group or whether you send it directly to me. I am no longer ashamed to ask it of you, for my present situation is serious, but the result of all this waiting could be spectacular. They must have confidence in me in Paris, as official circles here have confidence in me. But they are slow. My effort is desperate. Make a desperate effort for me and above all move with urgency, with great urgency, for I am at the end of my strength, my resistance, my reserve. I cannot go on and I am counting on you.

Antonin Artaud

Panic, Crisis, Disorder

Posted in Enormous Hotel on March 29, 2008 by sk0t

As qualitatively viral, humans (I) are characterized by having, existing within, and utilizing a figuralist consciousness–an infinitely layered multiform black (all-enveloping) abyss, a canvass host within a bipedal virus escalating towards a degradation or penultimate embrace. Language is the vehicle of transformation and exchange, the medium. Ideas, information, images operate as the other virus. It is only within the host consciousness that language can be recognized as virus in the W.S. Burroughs sense. Language is a dead stone, runic when applied in its four dimensions. Quite a large ordeal to presume of an-other body as altogether similar enough in a way to presume an easy classification of human to espouse a cultural Humanism that is any less monstrous than any other theology or mythology, so poetry is the supreme art, spoken language the most deadly to the magnetic bodies, ingested from the page, the most eternal.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.